The Polygraph Place

Thanks for stopping by our bulletin board.
Please take just a moment to register so you can post your own questions
and reply to topics. It is free and takes only a minute to register. Just click on the register link


  Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
  Professional Issues - Private Forum for Examiners ONLY
  Signed UCC-1308

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Signed UCC-1308
cpolys
Member
posted 01-09-2013 05:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpolys     Edit/Delete Message
Has anyone had an examinee sign UCC-1308 after their name? I've had individuals sign U.D. following their name, but not UCC-1308.

Marty

IP: Logged

Ted Todd
Member
posted 01-09-2013 08:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ted Todd     Edit/Delete Message
Marty,
I could be wrong but you may be dealing with one of those "Freeman" nut jobs. Pehaps someone in the Federal system such as Don or Skip may have a better read on this one. Perhaps this will help?


Categorized | Guest Posts


All Rights Reserved, UCC1-308 or its just business

Posted on June 24, 2011.


by Silas-Wesley: King, Junior, All Rights Reserved

All Rights Reserved, UCC1-308 in all places and at all times and I deny all.

Never give anyone your name when asked. Sign above your name on your drivers license, All Rights Reserved.

and when presented with any paperwork in court or on the street, say, “Let me see that. That’s not me, and I don’t think that person exist”. and give it back to the person that gave it to you.

Claim your rights at all times and refused compelled benefits. Be humble and say, ‘Sir’, ‘Your Honor’, etc.

It is just business. We are dealing in commerce. The life we live today has been re-directed, mis-directed and we have lost our perspective based on how we are educated in the school systems across America.

We are educated to be tax payers and cusip numbers. Every interaction we enter into is about commerce and contracts. The Founding Fathers at the least wanted us to learn and understand what commerce and contracts are about.

The ‘Banksters” are about controlling your money, the educational system and constantly making war and creating arguments. But, the thing people don’t know is that they always have to give you a remedy. Before they took over this nation they let everybody know how they would do it, and gave us the remedy. It is part of the contract, otherwise everything is a fraud.

A fraud is a fraud is a fraud.

It does matter when you find the fraud. At the beginning or at the end of the issue, it has always been a fraud.

The remedy is in Common Law. Common Law protects. it is like goose in the game called, ‘It’. Just say, “I Reserve All my Rights”.

Or…
Let it be known to all that I, am a beneficiary of the Trust, I explicitly reserve all of my rights. UCC 1-308 which was formally UCC 1-207. I reserve all of my rights at all times and in all places, nunc pro tunc (now for then) from the time of my birth and forevermore, not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Further, I am not a United States citizen or a 14th amendment citizen. I am a Citizen of the republic of Illinois and reject any attempted expatriation. See 15 United States statute at large, July 27th, 1868 also known as the expatriation statute.

Further, let all be advised that all actions commenced against me may be in violation of,
USC TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
USC TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241 Conspiracy against rights Violation fee is $250,000 per person or $500,000 in silver species per organization per incident or per 15 minutes or any part thereof. Wherefore all have undeniable knowledge.

In common law you use a notary and pay a dollar before there is an argument.

In Admiralty Maritime or Contract Law you pay an attorney or lawyer after there is an argument.

You pay a notary a dollar before or an attorney or lawyer after. Which one would you decide. Public or private. Common law or hidden contracts that are adhesions contracts that bind you to something you knew nothing about. Contract Law.

Attornment is the act of turning over property from one person to another.

Scribes studying to become knights would list all the property and create treaties for the winning nobleman of some contest. It is called attornment and the scribe later came to be called an attorney.

After the civil war, attorneys were sent over here from England to turn the land back over to England. The Banksters also took notice of the gold rush of 1949. The attorneys form the first labor union that kept any one from practicing law except lawyers and attorneys. But, you are expected to know the law. The law of your peers, common law, the law of the land.

Attorneys are used whenever there is an argument or to create an argument. The judge is there to decide who has to pay. Who has brought dis-honor to the contract or the agreement. This entire process has descended into both sides paying both the judge and the attorney. It is just business.

In these transactions no one has to be damaged. You just have to give your name and you are in the game. In Roman Law, you are guilty until proven innocent.

In common law, you are innocent until proven guilty.

In Roman Law, the all caps name, is used in commerce and once you give it, you have just given your title away. Who you gave it to, now owns you or you are considered a dead man. It is just business.

So, when asked to give your name, say “I reserve all my rights, UCC1-308, may I see the paperwork?” and there is paperwork somewhere because it’s just business.


[This message has been edited by Ted Todd (edited 01-09-2013).]

[This message has been edited by Ted Todd (edited 01-09-2013).]

IP: Logged

cpolys
Member
posted 01-10-2013 09:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cpolys     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks Ted. I did review some information at the time. By the way, this was a PCSOT case. The individual indicated that their attorney had informed them to write this after signing their name. When I asked for clarification regarding the intended implications of this code, such as if they were asserting some statutory or constitutional right, if they were indicating they were under duress, etc., they indicated they were unable to provide any concise information and indicated they were uncertain and I would need to receive clarification from their attorney. They did indicate that they did not agree with all statements on the consent form, but were unable to specify which ones and again indicated that clarifications would need to be made with their attorney, while simultaneously indicating they were willing to complete the examination. I declined to test and indicated that if they had legal concerns that those needed to remedied and/or his attorney would need to provide clarification.

IP: Logged

rnelson
Member
posted 01-11-2013 12:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rnelson   Click Here to Email rnelson     Edit/Delete Message
Good move.

Face this one head on, but not exposed.

Some offenders are looking for a conflict, and would love for someone to test them after they express duress.

r

------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)


IP: Logged

skipwebb
Member
posted 01-11-2013 01:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for skipwebb   Click Here to Email skipwebb     Edit/Delete Message
I can only assume that a sex offender, required by the court to undergo periodic polygraph examinations AND pay for it by the court, could possibly make the argument that signing the consent form and agreeing to undergo the examination was doing so under duress.

The Uniformed Commercial Code, specifically, UCC 1-308 states: Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as "without prejudice," "under protest," or the like are sufficient. According to the UCC. They could also just write Without Prejudice" under or above the signature and accomplish their goal of maintaining their right to protest at some future date.

I doubt this would ever legally hold water (apply) in criminal cases or even in PCSOT testing as the "contract" is between the examinee and the court system not the examiner. The examiner did not "order" the examination but merely facilitated it for a fee.

I seems analagous to the state DMV requiring one to obtain a vehicle inspection before a license tag will be issued. The owner must go to a licensed (but)commerical inspection station and obtain the required inspection and pay for it. The vehicle owner may feel he is being forced to undergo the inspection and pay for it and thereby doing so under duress as a condition of being able to be "free" to operate his vehicle.

As a result he is entering into a commerical contract with the commercial inspection station to pay for a service that has been forced upon him by a Government entity as a condition of operating his vehicle.

You know, it's kind of like Obamacare (LOL) (actually COL, cry out loud)

[This message has been edited by skipwebb (edited 01-11-2013).]

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Polygraph Place

Copyright 1999-2012. WordNet Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39c
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.